|
|
The Sex Museum in New York City has an air of sincere, yet haughty, confidence about its subject matter—much like any other museum you will walk into. Yet it is hard to look at the contents with a strictly educational lens, so the experience winds of being a mockery of the museum environment standard.
. . . → Read More: The Scarlet Bonobo: A Primate/Human Comparison
Apparently I am favoring prefaces lately, so I am going to go with it: there are times when I wonder if the collective conscious is actually at work in simple day-to-day events such as the construction of a blog. Today, I wanted to address question number three in the “Top Ten Questions about Sex-istentialism,” and . . . → Read More: Down To Fuck?
I promise this won’t happen often, but sometimes, a girl’s just got to provide a preface: Typically, I will try to write about some sort of legitimate relational topic pertaining to non-monogamy. However, this evening, as I sit at a bar I frequent and drink my favorite chocolate stout, I just have to rant a . . . → Read More: Sex Only
Some people ask me some strange things about how I live my non-monogamous lifestyle. I will tell you how I answer my top ten faves. . . . → Read More: The top 10 Questions about Sex-istentialism
I know you are going crazy in anticipation for my blog, I will explain everything in a bit, hang tight!
|
About Cecilia Rationale
I have always had a crush on Jay Gatsby. And I have always latently blamed the late, Great Gatsby for my initial campaign against traditional marriage. You see, when I was a fifteen-year-old high school English student, I couldn't help but advocate for Gatsby's cause and create my first critique on the institution of marital bliss.
Gatsby and Daisy were the titular characters of my paper defining the basis of my critique on marriage—that vows allow for a general stagnancy due to the lack of necessary relational reassessment. Instead of marriage, I posed that committed relationships should be contractual, spelling out expectations, and the general unspoken entitlements of monogamy would not be presumed. The contract would be subject to re-evaluation on an annual basis, and could be dissolved according to the agreed upon "relational separation" clause. Granted this rationale has grown over the years, but the main point remains intact...Read More!
|